So President Obama wants Israel to pull back to it’s pre-1967 borders, but from what I’ve read of the stated mission of Hamas they won’t be happy until the Jews in Israel have pulled back to their pre-1945 borders. In Germany.
Now I understand there’s a little give and take necessary to get a peaceful outcome, even if it’s not really just to one side or the other, but I haven’t seen any give whatsoever from the Palestinian side as I’ve watched this situation over the last few decades. In any case … the 1967 war was fought 44 years ago, and it’s pretty ridiculous to think that Israel should give up everything they’ve fought for for two generations.
But even if they did … what’s the point? This won’t be enough to placate the other side, a faction of which has promised to “push them into the sea.”
With the renaming of the newest navy ship after Cesar Chavez (a courageous man and hero to many, but not a military man or government leader) and other moves, it’s apparent the Obama administration is doing everything they can to get the Hispanic vote. But with this statement on Israel, clearly they assume the Jewish vote and Jewish support is in the bag.
Better learn to play a little hard-to-get if you want any love from this administration, liberal friends.
Off Road
The best book ever written!
By me, anyway.
Set against the background of the American civil war of “progressives” vs. patriotic American traditionalists and a family caught in the middle, Off Road is a journey into the uniquely American world of God, guns, big trucks … and family.
More information here. Buy it at amazon.com in paperback or Kindle (only .99 for Kindle, which can also be read on a PC with a free reader). Or at Barnes and Noble in paperback or Nook (only .99 in Nook format). Or in any Ebook format, even .html or .pdf, for .99 from smashwords.com.
In the hours following the taking of Usama (Osama?) Bin Laden we heard all kinds of great pro-American/non-partisan words. Everyone from President Obama to former President George W. Bush. Good Stuff, and it made me proud to hear Americans with such different views on current issues coming together on this one, the taking out of the greatest mass murderer in American history. But now I just sat through most of The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell, and the thin-lipped expressionless-one who replaced Olbermann turned his entire show into a partisan pro Democrat/Bush attacking hate fest. Seriously? Where they heck do they get these people?!
He started his show by staring into the camera and stating in his monotone:
President Bush had 2086 days to catch Usama Bin Laden. President Obama got that job done in 831 days.
Yes, he did. Using intelligence taken from operatives captured during Bush’s term and interrogated in the Gitmo prison created by President Bush — possibly with the methods that the Democrats claimed were useless and torture.
Now if one wanted to become partisan on this issue one could legitimately ask why it took until now to get Bin Laden if they’ve known where he was since August 2010. But I honestly don’t, as I give Mr. Obama the benefit of the doubt and assume he moved as expeditiously as possible. It was a tricky political issue to send assault helicopters 400 miles into sovereign territory and attack a private home less than 40 miles from that nation’s capital, and not something one does on a whim. Frankly, I’m as impressed as all hell that he took the risk of doing it AND was able to get together the required foreign assets to make it happen (I’m sure it will be a decade before we know all the details, but whatever else Mr. Obama does this will be a shining achievement of his administration).
At the moment I couldn’t be happier with the decisions Obama’s made in carrying out the war in Afghanistan, though history is still the final judge.
But as for O’Donnell … I’m not going to detail every petty little minute (and petty they were) but he continued with a string of visitors generally chosen to demean President Bush and build up Obama, calling it an issue of “leadership.” Even proclaiming one big change was trading out Rumsfeld for Gates as the Secretary of Defense, even though that change took place in November 2006, well over 2 years before President Obama took office. If Gates is a great Secretary of Defense that’s another good choice both presidents share.
Did President Bush proclaim Bin Laden was secondary to the overall war on terror and turn a great deal of attention elsewhere after the Taliban were chased out of power in Afghanistan? He did, and I think he was correct to do so. As he said … the war against terror is much greater than one man. Proven by the fact it’s not now over because that one man is dead — however happy it makes us all feel.
In hindsight I would say it was a mistake to go into Iraq, but we did prevail in that war and only history will ultimately judge if it was worth the cost. Did making Iraq a functioning, if shaky, democracy have anything to do with the current “Arab Spring,” for better or worse? Once again … history will answer.
And how did O’Donnell end this little hate fest that should offend EVERY American who thinks that while politics are important, there are some issues that transcend them? By attacking Rudy Giuliani, the hero of New Yorkers at the time of the 9-11 attack, for being too partisan (which besides being in really bad taste is rather like Josef Stalin criticizing anyone for being too tyrannical of a leader).
And Rudy Giuliani … should be saying, “Thank God, Barack Obama, is our President.” But of course he will not say that. Rudy Giuliani could never look into his soul and find the grace to say something like that about a political opponent. Giuliani is simply too partisan to say that. And much, much too simple minded.
President Obama did his job and took out an enemy of America. But would John McCain have done any less? Would ANY of the serious candidates for President (excepting Kucinich, though I don’t know if I’d call him a serious candidate) have done any less? Of course not. Republican or Democrat, once you’re President defending the U.S. is job one.
O’Donnell is just plain despicable. The sooner MSNBC dumps this idiot the better.
The sad thing is … I find myself missing Keith Olbermann. Olbermann was no better overall on his outlook, but he could at least vary his facial features and vocal tone/inflection enough to make his ridiculously pompous verbal strutting interesting.
Soon enough we’ll have to go back to talking about government debt, how to stimulate job growth, Healthcare, etc. … but couldn’t the MSNBC Democrat shills have given us at least a week to enjoy this as a united people?
Off Road
The best book ever written!
By me, anyway.
Set against the background of the American civil war of “progressives” vs. patriotic American traditionalists and a family caught in the middle, Off Road is a journey into the uniquely American world of God, guns, big trucks … and family.
More information here. Buy it at amazon.com in paperback or Kindle (only .99 for Kindle, which can also be read on a PC with a free reader). Or at Barnes and Noble in paperback or Nook (only .99 in Nook format). Or in any Ebook format, even .html or .pdf, for .99 from smashwords.com.
Between this burial and the Japanese Nuclear Power accident … it’s going to be a long time before I eat any seafood. I wonder which will have the most toxic effect on the ocean?
Off Road
The best book ever written!
By me, anyway.
Set against the background of the American civil war of “progressives” vs. patriotic American traditionalists and a family caught in the middle, Off Road is a journey into the uniquely American world of God, guns, big trucks … and family.
More information here. Buy it at amazon.com in paperback or Kindle (only .99 for Kindle, which can also be read on a PC with a free reader). Or at Barnes and Noble in paperback or Nook (only .99 in Nook format). Or in any Ebook format, even .html or .pdf, for .99 from smashwords.com.
The Bible says to pray for your enemies. So I will, and have. But it’s hard not to be a little happy/relieved right now at the demise of Usama Bin Laden, even though I wouldn’t be surprised to read of significant counter strikes in the weeks to come. Doesn’t matter, it had to be done.
One retired general on Fox made the comment that this is good timing for offing the bastard; most of the Arab nations are tied up with their own problems right now. I hope so.
God bless the US forces who undertook this dangerous mission and took this guy out mano-a-mano (or as close as you can come with modern warfare), with boots on the ground rather than unmanned drones overhead. And to those who helped them find him.
The war goes on. But at least one figurehead is off the playing field. He won’t be missed.
Off Road
The best book ever written!
By me, anyway.
Set against the background of the American civil war of “progressives” vs. patriotic American traditionalists and a family caught in the middle, Off Road is a journey into the uniquely American world of God, guns, big trucks … and family.
More information here. Buy it at amazon.com in paperback or Kindle (only .99 for Kindle, which can also be read on a PC with a free reader). Or at Barnes and Noble in paperback or Nook (only .99 in Nook format). Or in any Ebook format, even .html or .pdf, for .99 from smashwords.com.
Another video of how if you really want a gun, you can make one. This time by someone who has few more tools than I have in my own garage:
And here’s a video on how, with a few thousands dollars worth of tools, you can make fully functional AK47′s:
Gun control affects people like me, and probably you, because we follow the laws and always will. For people who don’t care about the laws … where there is a will (and money) there is a way. Has drug control made it any harder for people who want drugs to get them?
(I believe I found this at the firearm blog, but I lost the exact URL and don’t have time to look for it. Sorry.)
Off Road
The best book ever written!
By me, anyway.
Set against the background of the American civil war of “progressives” vs. patriotic American traditionalists and a family caught in the middle, Off Road is a journey into the uniquely American world of God, guns, big trucks … and family.
More information here. Buy it at amazon.com in paperback or Kindle (only .99 for Kindle, which can also be read on a PC with a free reader). Or at Barnes and Noble in paperback or Nook (only .99 in Nook format). Or in any Ebook format, even .html or .pdf, for .99 from smashwords.com.
This post is a primer for those who are going to see Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged but haven’t read the book. The movie is fast paced and jumps into the middle of the plot (as it must to avoid being 50 hours long) so a lot is skipped, and some helpful backstory is missing. So if you’re taking someone to see the movie who hasn’t read the book, or if you’re going to see it yourself … here’s some helpful background without anything I would consider a “spoiler.” This isn’t everything, of course … but just a few key facts I think make the movie much more enjoyable
An Overview:
Ayn Rand doesn’t respect or celebrate people who gain money for the sake of gaining money; for her the joy is in the creation of something (a new and cool metal, an awesome railroad, etc.) and money is the proof that you’ve done well and produced something people need (i.e. most of the current computer moguls got into computers for love, but got rich because they did the right things and made all our lives better). And Rand only respects people who don’t ride the coattails of others, which is why she has no pity for people who lose money blindly trusting idiotic schemes.
But neither are Rand’s characters heartless. Yes, they think it is condescending and wrong to give welfare to people who don’t want to work, and they think it’s crazy that someone who aspires to be nothing greater than a janitor should have the same wealth as someone who has created a new product that is changing the world. But throughout the book the characters are constantly giving a helping hand to those deserving of it; to those willing to try.
Where the movie opens:
When the movie opens the U.S. is facing a financial crisis, and the government is responding by regulating trade (sound familiar?). But these regulations, intended to protect individuals and ignoring impacts to productivity (sound familiar?), are destroying the most successful businesses and making things worse. Which is when “The Destroyer” appears.
The “Destroyer”:
The movie opens with a shadowy man in a hat addressing a successful banker, Midas Mulligan (see video below) in the rain. And then we find out he immediately disappears. What you don’t know from the movie is that Midas Mulligan has become boxed in by government regulation and the moment we are seeing is the moment he has realized that he cannot succeed in the environment regulation has created. And that’s always when “the Destroyer” shows up (the Destroyer is what Dagny calls this shadowy character in the novel, because he is taking away the most powerful men when she feels they are needed most).
That powerful people are abandoning their businesses and disappearing when government interference becomes too much to continue is a central theme to the book, and the mystery is where the heck are they going.
The Backstory you don’t get in the movie:
Francisco and Dagney are self made successes. Yes, they were born into wealthy families already key to their industry … but they both set out anonymously on their own and made their own success. Dagney took a job at a rail yard doing menial work to learn the business from the ground up, and that’s how she gained the trust and love of her workers. Francisco disappeared to anonymously take a job at a competing copper mine — and ended up owning the mine — before he resurfaced to claim the life of wealth and privilege he was born to. The two became unabashed lovers at a young age as they had so much in common, but then Francisco went to college and mysteriously changed. He went from being an intense young man intent on growing his family business to a worthless playboy squandering his family’s wealth. One of the mysteries is … why?
James Taggart never understood his sister or Francisco. He thought they were mean and selfish because they wanted to work hard and make a lot of money. He went off to college and became enamored of the concept of social charity, but it quickly becomes apparent that he believes in social charity/social justice because he doesn’t think anyone else is capable of succeeding on their own (though his own ancestors did), and passing laws to help them out makes him feel superior. But of course those laws also limit business growth and thus the opportunities of those people to succeed on their own.
Trains:
When Ayn Rand wrote Atlas Shrugged trains were still a primary means of traveling long distances, as airline tickets were expensive. In order to make it logical that trains are still important in the modern day we are told that energy issues have made oil so expensive that trains have had to return as primary means of human and freight transportation. You either buy into that or not as you watch the movie … but I did think it is a delightful irony that a return to train travel (the high speed trains the government wants to spend billions on, because private industry knows they don’t make sense) is a primary goal of the current liberal elite in this nation, who are actively trying to make oil so expensive that we have to take a turn in this direction.
Now Go see the Movie:
Although reading a few paragraphs on the characters isn’t the same as seeing them developed in the book, if you keep the above in mind as you watch the movie you’ll understand it a whole lot better. So either read the book and then see the movie, or see the movie then read the book, or … well, the order is up to you.
Set against the background of the American civil war of “progressives” vs. patriotic American traditionalists and a family caught in the middle, Off Road is a journey into the uniquely American world of God, guns, big trucks … and family.
More information here. Buy it at amazon.com in paperback or Kindle (only .99 for Kindle, which can also be read on a PC with a free reader). Or at Barnes and Noble in paperback or Nook (only .99 in Nook format). Or in any Ebook format, even .html or .pdf, for .99 from smashwords.com.
So I was hoping that after seeing the movie based on Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged I’d be sitting here awestruck writing up a glowing report of the motion picture about to change America. But while I really enjoyed it and it is extraordinarily well done for any movie — much less one with a relatively low budget and non-big name actors — I’m a little concerned that it might not be accessible to people who haven’t read the book (and check out this post for a primer on what you need to know if you fall into that category). So while people who have read the book number in the many millions and could make the movie successful, they’re not the people who need to see it; the people who need to see it probably never will.
Henry Rearden at his desk.
The crowd I watched it with (and it was very well attended) were clearly fans of the novel. Everyone laughed knowingly when characters or government programs were announced even though they weren’t yet developed, which left my wife — who hasn’t read the book — feeling a bit left out. And when I tried to stand back and view the movie as though I wasn’t well acquainted with the story I understood why; there’s a lot of extremely complex scenes being addressed in a very short amount of time, and if you don’t already know some of the characters and their motivations what’s happening isn’t always obvious.
For instance, we never see the history of Dagney and Francisco d’Anconia, so if you haven’t read the book you don’t realize that even though they were born into wealth and power they are people who insisted on going out on their own and anonymously developing their success to prove their worth. Unlike Jim Taggart, who accepted his wealth and position and then used it to prove himself superior to others by condescendingly pretending it was his duty to support them.
Kudos, though, to the producers for realizing they couldn’t tackle a tome like Atlas Shrugged by trying to follow the story line exactly. So they jumped in with the plot well underway to avoid a lot of tedious development and something had to be cut. I just hope they didn’t cut too much.
Dagney and Wyatt Ellis. Perfect casting, I'd say.
And the producers were also smart enough to dump the outdated commentary on sexuality that Ms. Rand included in the novel. Some might disagree, but while I understand why she included it — she was writing a story about brazen adultery and a woman who actually dared to *gasp* enjoy sex in the 1950′s with more than one partner — it falls flat to a modern audience. We already know that women are capable of enjoying sex and that adultery happens — and sometimes it’s even understandable when a marriage has failed in a painful way. So no need to talk about it, and they didn’t.
Here are some more good points:
Photography and editing did not reveal the low budget at all. Very nice.
Incredible panoramas of my home state of Colorado and the Rocky Mountain Region — a lot of places I recognized, and they did the photography at the most beautiful time of year, when the aspen are changing and in their full golden glory.
Casting was spot-on. With a couple of exceptions, everyone looked and acted roughly how I imagined them.
Music was excellent, though noticeably missing was Richard Halley’s 5th symphony (a victim of the shortened movie format).
So my conclusion is:
If you’ve read the book — Go see this movie ASAP. You’ll really appreciate it.
If you haven’t read the book — Read the book, then go see the movie asap.
If you don’t want to read a wordy 1950′s 1,000 page book — Go with someone who has read it and is a Rand believer, then buy then coffee afterward so they can explain it to you.
Set against the background of the American civil war of “progressives” vs. patriotic American traditionalists and a family caught in the middle, Off Road is a journey into the uniquely American world of God, guns, big trucks … and family.
More information here. Buy it at amazon.com in paperback or Kindle (only .99 for Kindle, which can also be read on a PC with a free reader). Or at Barnes and Noble in paperback or Nook (only .99 in Nook format). Or in any Ebook format, even .html or .pdf, for .99 from smashwords.com.
The movie Atlas Shrugged is being released today, and it’s as polarizing a work as a state supreme court vote in Wisconsin — for proof, take a look at the discussion taking place on the movie’s website. And as you can see from the comments the progressive left is desperately trying to belittle the entire work and convince people not to see it — which proves that it’s worth seeing in the first place.
But then, the new progressive/far left mode of operation seems to be to attack the personal or unrelated aspects of whomever you want to shut up. Because it’s much easier to scream Hitler! Fox lies! Teabaggers! Tan Man! and mock the figureheads of the other side for being too pretty or too rural than dealing directly with the issues. And since the facts and the outlook of the American people generally work against them (because however good they felt after the 2008 election, what they had was a reaction to an unpopular president and NOT a mandate for socialized hope and change) insults and mockery are about all they have left.
I got plenty of commentary on my last Atlas Shrugged post as well, so just let me make this clear going forward … this was an incredibly powerful book for me, but not because it taught me a new way to live every aspect of my life (which it has for some) but because it reveals in a startlingly powerful way the role of government in people’s lives. And how the progressive push to force government to constantly do more “good” and take care of everybody and control society will have the effect of making a worse future for our children, not a better one, unless we’re extraordinarily careful. And this is not idle conjecture, it’s something we’ve seen in real life repeatedly throughout the last hundred years.
The bottom line is — I don’t think anyone would argue that communism, which incorporates socialism and a Utopian political view, has been proven as unworkable and actually evil in its end result; millions have died and continue to die or are held in poverty because of that political experiment. But strip away the class struggle aspects and the dictatorship of the proletariat and many people are still quite comfortable with the socialism aspect. But is that good? Or in the long run does it create a society where the energies and output of the best and hardest working people are stolen by the government for purposes they may or may not agree with, leaving the best and brightest with a motivation to actually STOP being the drivers of society and business?
Is it right to take tax money from people who, for ANY reason, find some particular medical procedure morally objectionable, and then use it to pay for others to to have that procedure?
Is it right to take tax money from workers/share holders of Ford and use it to shore up their competition? Thus reducing the profits of the Ford shareholders and reducing the career options of the Ford workers? With their OWN hard earned money?
Would it be right to take tax money from the believers of the anti-gun Brady Campaign and give it to me to buy more guns?
Things to think about as you buy your advance tickets online and head out. And let’s hope that while it’s a low budget movie without any really big “A list” stars … that it captures the essence of the book and leads to complete the series.
Off Road
The best book ever written!
By me, anyway.
Set against the background of the American civil war of “progressives” vs. patriotic American traditionalists and a family caught in the middle, Off Road is a journey into the uniquely American world of God, guns, big trucks … and family.
More information here. Buy it at amazon.com in paperback or Kindle (only .99 for Kindle, which can also be read on a PC with a free reader). Or at Barnes and Noble in paperback or Nook (only .99 in Nook format). Or in any Ebook format, even .html or .pdf, for .99 from smashwords.com.
I’m a big fan of Redeye on Fox News, but last Friday Gutfeld’s panel mostly got it completely wrong on the issue of the new Arizona law that would make it legal to carry firearms on college campuses. Did the Redeye panel deal with the actual issues at hand, or go immediately to chair wetting exclaims of “Oh My God stoned and drunk teenage students waving guns around in class and shooting professors because of bad grades and hormones and did we mention they’re all stoned and drunk and nuts?” Let’s just say … the majority of the chairs needed recovering when the segment ended, though Mr. Gutfeld’s outlook was much more reasonable.
To recap, the new law would make it legal for people who can legally carry a weapon (meaning pretty much any law abiding citizen over the age of 18, since Arizona allows 18 and over to “open carry”) to drive or walk across an Arizona campus with a firearm on their person or in their vehicle, though they cannot enter any building (i.e. dorm room/classroom) with the firearm. Though I would have liked it if the law had gone a step further and included access to buildings, to me this just seems like a common sense updating of an outdated law. Firearm carry for self defense is legal and ubiquitous in Arizona, and the current law forces people who partake of this right to either walk/drive around campuses rather than through them. So if you are carrying and make a wrong turn in Arizona and cross into a campus or take a short cut to walk across a campus because it’s 110 degrees out … you’re a criminal. Which means I’m certain this is a law that gets inadvertently broken everyday.
Going through the mostly misguided panel …
Townhall.com editor Katie Pavlich (so bright the sun just installed Katie Pavlich panels {as opposed to human solar panels — get it?})
Ms. Pavlich at least got the logic right, though she erroneously believed this law would only affected licensed concealed carriers. But her logic is spot on. “I don’t know about you, but when I was in college I didn’t want to shoot anybody just because my grade was bad … Texas had it right when they let them carry actually into buildings, because shootings happen inside classrooms not outside the door.”
Writer John DeVore,(same type of voter as {absent} Bill Schultz, but withmuch less odor)
A Texan, who claims to be pro gun rights, but … “this is a bad idea … college campuses are incubators of bad life choices. When I was in college I was a sloppy emotional flop(?) donkey” and … “if you want to carry weapons you should enlist.“
Comedian Jesse Joyce (funnier than a belt made of clown lips)
“College students are the kind of people that determine that what ping pong needs (is) the chance of getting hepatitis and competitive alcoholism“
Attorney Remi Spencer (reportedly cuter than a Carebear eating a smurf sandwich)
Thinks young people with guns are OK in the military, but is against really any civilian having a gun. “I know how to shoot … I have shot … but I don’t think I’m the right person to protect the entire class if there’s a wild gunman …“
It’s Attorney Spencer’s rsponse I find the most offensive. It’s basically a reiteration of the famous Regan quote:
When Conservatives don’t want guns, they don’t buy them. When Liberals don’t want guns, they want them outlawed
Changing it only slightly to be:
When Conservatives think the best they can be is a helpless victim, they accept it. When Liberals think the best they can be is a helpless victim, they legislate that everyone be a helpless victim.
Well, for Ms. Spencer I have a story. Of a young woman we’ll refer to as “Linda,” who served her country honorably as a soldier and a Military Police (MP) Officer and carried a firearm proudly to defend her country and to keep the peace, both on base and in war zones. When she left the service she attended a university here in Colorado, and though she did get her CCW license and carried a gun most of the time, the rules Ms. Remy supports kept her from carrying on campus. Or walking to campus. Which is where she was brutally assaulted. And though she was well trained and fought back hard, the 300 lb assailant was able to overpower her and have his way. Had she been carrying the firearm she normally does, that scumbag would have received a bullet wound for his troubles and either be dead or serving time while recovering. But thanks to the logic of those such as Ms. Spencer — if I can’t do it, then no one can — the assailant has another star on his “women humiliated” scorcoard and is still out there looking for more. And Linda has a violent, humiliating experience that she was forced to endure and must now deal with because those such as Ms. Spencer would not empower her to defend herself.
Now the above is not a story I know about personally, but with a few variations it has happened in many places. College campuses, besides stoned and drunk teenagers, have a lot of young veterans on them. And a lot of responsible youth who are not veterans. And if my daughter were in a college classroom when a crazy shooter appeared … maybe Ms. Spencer would be useless even if armed, but I’d rather there be someone there who at least has the potential of being able to fight back.
This is America, dammit. Self defense is an American tradition, enforced victimization is not.
For my own college experiences … had I been able to carry a gun, I wouldn’t have — but that’s a point for this law, not against it. I wouldn’t have carried because even back then I was responsible (i.e. I never drove drunk) and there are too many variables in college, too many times you expect to spend the night studying and instead end up at a party where you wouldn’t want to be responsible for a firearm … and I don’t carry if I’m going to be drinking even a little bit. And is there any reason to believe that college students don’t still have at least that level of common sense? Ms. Pavlich agrees with me.
Now I did have a gun in my dorm room, which means I had the potential to take a gun anywhere I wanted, as I went out target shooting occasionally and didn’t realize it wasn’t allowed (as a Colorado kid it never occurred to me I couldn’t have a gun stored in my room, though it was illegal) and believe me, a whole lot of other students had guns in their rooms as well.
So let’s start applying some real common sense to all laws, including gun laws, and get rid of those that do nothing to defend anybody but just make life more legally dangerous for gun owners. Of any age. And Ms. Spencer can choose not to carry if she wants to, but leave other’s to make their own choices.
Off Road
The best book ever written!
By me, anyway.
Set against the background of the American civil war of “progressives” vs. patriotic American traditionalists and a family caught in the middle, Off Road is a journey into the uniquely American world of God, guns, big trucks … and family.
More information here. Buy it at amazon.com in paperback or Kindle (only .99 for Kindle, which can also be read on a PC with a free reader). Or at Barnes and Noble in paperback or Nook (only .99 in Nook format). Or in any Ebook format, even .html or .pdf, for .99 from smashwords.com.
Last month I completed a journey through Ayn Rand’s epic novel Atlas Shrugged, (now a movie to be released 4/15/2011) and it many ways it was a more life changing experience than any other fictional book I’ve read — so much so that I’ve decided to devote a series of posts to it. And Atlas Shrugged is a journey every American should take, even if they end up rejecting the human liberty and free market values it espouses, so they can at least understand what they risk when they promote a government that supplies and controls everything (or anything, for that matter). Because Rand shows us, in a graphic portrayal, that sometimes what feels “safer” and more “compassionate” is actually less so in the long run. And the bottom line is … when you live in the most successful nation the world has ever seen, do you “fundamentally” change it on a whim to pattern it after less successful nations?
That such an eye opening journey is necessary is apparent by the crushing government debt and subsequent riots in Greece and elsewhere, and the fact that we in the U.S. are headed down the same path. And even though we are facing what is inarguably an unsustainable debt load that WILL overwhelm our economy if not turned around, many politicians continue to argue about “what’s fair” in spending without even a nod to what we can afford … and that’s a big, big problem. I don’t think it’s fair that I work really hard and don’t have the brand new Mustang I want … I think I deserve a brand new Mustang because I work way more hours than a lot of people who do have one … but wanting and deserving and saying “not fair!” isn’t going to put a new Mustang in my garage. Any more than wanting and deserving and saying “not fair” will give every American platinum health insurance without somebody sacrificing something somewhere (and in the case of Universal healthcare it’s everybody sacrificing a lot everywhere).
Now Ayn Rand is no goddess to me, and her book is NOT The Bible by any means. While I think she absolutely nails the basis of the majority of human interactions with her social theories, I think she makes a mistake in trying to define humansentirely by that single standard. Yes, throughout the day the vast majority of my interactions with people, from co-workers to shop keepers to fellow drivers, is perfectly explained by her objectivistic philosophy. But to define my whole life in that manner is to ignore the primal nature of humanity — and I don’t mean primal as a negative, but rather as a nod to our basic human nature, which is just as worthy of admiration and celebration as our intellectual capacity. Because while we are all intellectual beings capable of great thought, either through our God created nature or the instincts forged into us by evolution (whichever you believe in the results are the same) there is much more to us than that.
Touch one of my children, and I’m no longer an intellectual human, I’m a silverback gorilla protecting his off spring. How many people do you know who have stayed loyal to their marriage even after their spouse is crippled or disabled, and has become a daily burden? In that situation, do you respect the person who stands by their spouse to the end, or the one that says “I only live once, and you aren’t the life partner I chose and you provide nothing to me, so adios.” And as to the sexual nature of humanity … well, while I found fascinating Ms. Rand’s take on male sexuality … I’ve been a male for many decades now, and all I can say is that her perception is more the way a 1950′s feminist would like to believe than reality.
In the days of my liberal youth and liberal associates I was assured that Atlas Shrugged was a hateful book written by an insane egotist and not one I should touch. In recent years I’ve heard it described as the cornerstone of conservatism/libertarianism, and one I should read if I ever want to understand what made America the world power it is … and what forces can drag it back down. While it’s much more the latter than the former, it doesn’t fit either definition perfectly. I do wish I had read it when younger, though, as at my current age it reinforced and enhanced my knowledge of humanity rather than forged it.
One obstacle to getting people to read Atlas Shrugged is that it’s one heck of a long tome (I can’t imagine how many finger flicks I did on the iPhone Kindle app to get through it all). And if I’m honest … as powerful as the story is, Ms. Rand’s writing style is painfully wordy at times and she feels a need to repeat herself, as though teaching us a lesson with one anecdote isn’t enough and she needs to have multiple anecdotes with the same outcome. And each with a character that goes over the lesson in detail. And to really drive it all home she has the main character give a speech that runs somewhere around 70 pages (too much to handle in one sitting) to detail her entire outlook — which has already been detailed by her story telling. Hopefully the movie producers for Atlas Shrugged have figured out how to handle the content of the book without getting bogged down by the incessant detail — we’ll know in a couple of weeks.
There’s a lot of things I think are worth covering in the book, and this post is just an introduction. I’ll be dissecting different pieces and talking about them in posts to come. As an overview …
Ms. Rand is harshly honest in her view of mankind and what motivates us. Because the bottom line is … we do very few things that don’t have some value to ourselves, and trying to pretend otherwise is not only dishonest but self destructive. She further points out that doing things for ourselves, in the long run, adds value to the public overall and is not something to be ashamed of. And a culture that embraces that principle (as the U.S. historically has) not only allows us all to shine our brightest, but the net effect is that the sum of the whole becomes greater than the sum of the parts.
So buy Atlas Shrugged, read it, and then think responsibly about the future. And don’t believe it when some politician says he can provide healthcare (or any government service) to everyone with no new taxes and nothing but savings for all. Because while whatever he’s promising may be worth paying/sacrificing for … it sure ain’t free, and that means somebody’s paying for it somewhere, and why isn’t that part of the debate? And whatever the government spends OUR money on … they’re using money we could have spent on something else, possibly buying the product that your company makes and helping support your job.
Off Road
The best book ever written!
By me, anyway.
Set against the background of the American civil war of “progressives” vs. patriotic American traditionalists and a family caught in the middle, Off Road is a journey into the uniquely American world of God, guns, big trucks … and family.
More information here. Buy it at amazon.com in paperback or Kindle (only .99 for Kindle, which can also be read on a PC with a free reader). Or at Barnes and Noble in paperback or Nook (only .99 in Nook format). Or in any Ebook format, even .html or .pdf, for .99 from smashwords.com.